Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
o
Google AI

DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flash
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
DeepSeek Flash Latest about 91% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, DeepSeek Flash Latest lists approximately 91% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, DeepSeek Flash Latest delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek Flash Latest listed rate totals ~$1.36, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to DeepSeek Flash Latest yields ~$13.64/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
DeepSeek Flash Latest (openrouter)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.60 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.0050 / 1M Tokens
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.