Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.6
Google AI
Moonshot AI

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Kimi K2.6

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flash

Kimi K2.6

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: moonshotai-kimi-k3
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Gemini 3.7 Flash about 14% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Gemini 3.7 Flash lists approximately 14% lower than Kimi K2.6. For high-throughput production workloads, Gemini 3.7 Flash delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while Kimi K2.6 totals ~$17.50. Switching to Gemini 3.7 Flash yields ~$2.50/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot AI)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.95 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$4.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
$0.16 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
262K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.