Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Hunyuan Code
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flashIllustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Hunyuan Code about 48% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Hunyuan Code lists approximately 48% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Hunyuan Code delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 3.7 Flash listed rate totals ~$15.00, while Hunyuan Code totals ~$7.84. Switching to Hunyuan Code yields ~$7.16/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Hunyuan Code (Tencent)
Input listed rate
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
$0.56 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
$1.12 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1049K Tokens
64K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.