Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek
Google AI

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash about 40% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash lists approximately 40% lower than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. For high-throughput production workloads, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4.1 Flash listed rate totals ~$4.83, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite totals ~$8.00. Switching to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash yields ~$3.17/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek)
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.0030 / 1M Tokens
$0.30 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$2.40 / 1M Tokens
$2.50 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.0030 / 1M Tokens
$0.03 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.