Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5
Google AI
Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Gemini 2.5 Pro about 59% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Gemini 2.5 Pro lists approximately 59% lower than Claude Opus 5.5. For high-throughput production workloads, Gemini 2.5 Pro delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Gemini 2.5 Pro listed rate totals ~$32.50, while Claude Opus 5.5 totals ~$80.00. Switching to Gemini 2.5 Pro yields ~$47.50/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google AI)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$1.25 / 1M Tokens
$4.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
$20.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.13 / 1M Tokens
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1049K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.