Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Fireworks AI
Google AI

DeepSeek V3 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flash
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
DeepSeek V3 about 28% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, DeepSeek V3 lists approximately 28% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, DeepSeek V3 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V3 listed rate totals ~$10.80, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to DeepSeek V3 yields ~$4.20/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
DeepSeek V3 (Fireworks AI)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.90 / 1M tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.90 / 1M tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
—
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.