Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
DeepSeek
NVIDIA

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B about 100% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
πŸ“Œ Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B lists approximately 100% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
πŸ’‘ 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B totals ~$0.00. Switching to Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B yields ~$10.56/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload β†’
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B (NVIDIA)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
β€”
Context Window
1000K Tokens
262K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

πŸ†Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: API Pricing, Token Cost & Context Comparison