DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct about 100% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct lists approximately 100% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct totals ~$0.00. Switching to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct yields ~$10.56/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (NVIDIA)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1000K Tokens
128K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.