i
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Ling 3.0 Flash VL about 97% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL lists approximately 97% lower than DeepSeek V4 Pro. For high-throughput production workloads, Ling 3.0 Flash VL delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): DeepSeek V4 Pro listed rate totals ~$10.56, while Ling 3.0 Flash VL totals ~$0.33. Switching to Ling 3.0 Flash VL yields ~$10.23/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
DeepSeek V4 Pro (DeepSeek)
Ling 3.0 Flash VL (inclusionai)
Input listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.98 / 1M Tokens
$0.06 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.0042 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
262K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.