Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Claude Sonnet 5
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Deprecated
Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Qwen3.5 397B A17B about 67% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B lists approximately 67% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, Qwen3.5 397B A17B delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Claude Sonnet 5 listed rate totals ~$40.00, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B totals ~$13.20. Switching to Qwen3.5 397B A17B yields ~$26.80/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Together AI)
Input listed rate
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
$0.60 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
$3.60 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
$0.35 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
1000K Tokens
262K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.