Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Anthropic
OpenAI

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Claude Sonnet 5

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: openai-gpt-5.6
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k about 5% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k lists approximately 5% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Claude Sonnet 5 listed rate totals ~$40.00, while GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k totals ~$38.00. Switching to GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k yields ~$2.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k (OpenAI)
Input listed rate
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
$3.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
$4.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1000K Tokens
16K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.