Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Anthropic
NVIDIA

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Claude Sonnet 5

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Deprecated

Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 about 100% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 lists approximately 100% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Claude Sonnet 5 listed rate totals ~$40.00, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 totals ~$0.00. Switching to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 yields ~$40.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (NVIDIA)
Input listed rate
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
$0.0000 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
—
Context Window
1000K Tokens
131K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.