Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/Seed 1.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5
ByteDance
Anthropic

Seed 1.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

Seed 1.8

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: bytedance-doubao-seed-2-1-pro-260628

Claude Sonnet 5

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Seed 1.8 about 91% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Seed 1.8 lists approximately 91% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, Seed 1.8 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Seed 1.8 listed rate totals ~$3.56, while Claude Sonnet 5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to Seed 1.8 yields ~$36.44/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
Seed 1.8 (ByteDance)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$0.12 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.19 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
$0.02 / 1M Tokens
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
256K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.