Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Claude Sonnet 5
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Claude Sonnet 5
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct about 91% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct lists approximately 91% lower than Claude Sonnet 5. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct listed rate totals ~$3.56, while Claude Sonnet 5 totals ~$40.00. Switching to Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct yields ~$36.44/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct (Microsoft Azure)
Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic)
Input listed rate
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
$2.00 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.78 / 1M Tokens
$10.00 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.20 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
128K Tokens
1000K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.