Skip to content
ModelPriceLab

Search model prices

Find source-linked rates by model, vendor, or platform.

Model Services/GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Microsoft Azure
Google AI

GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison

GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125

Deprecated

Deprecated endpoints may still be callable. Migrate before retirement.

Gemini 3.7 Flash

Legacy / Superseded

Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.

Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flash
Illustrative Listed-Rate Difference
GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 about 47% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 lists approximately 47% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation

Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 listed rate totals ~$8.00, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 yields ~$7.00/mo in raw token savings.

Model Your Workload →
Metric
GPT-3.5 Turbo 0125 (Microsoft Azure)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.50 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$1.50 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
16K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm

🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards

Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.

Want to map listed prices to your usage?

Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.