Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
2026 Stored listed rates & illustrative token-cost comparison
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Legacy / Superseded
Legacy / superseded version. Newer models are available; official or partner channels may still serve this version.
Replacement reference: gemini-3.8-flashIllustrative Listed-Rate Difference
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) about 80% lower
1M input + 200K output tokens; not a monthly bill
📌 Executive Summary (TL;DR):Under a standard baseline of 1M input + 200K output tokens, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) lists approximately 80% lower than Gemini 3.7 Flash. For high-throughput production workloads, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) delivers superior unit economics; model your specific monthly workload below before migrating.(Price records last updated 2026-10-11 (UTC))
💡 10M Monthly Token Workload Simulation
Simulating a production workload (10M input + 2M output tokens): Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) listed rate totals ~$3.02, while Gemini 3.7 Flash totals ~$15.00. Switching to Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) yields ~$11.98/mo in raw token savings.
Metric
Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct (US) (AWS Bedrock)
Gemini 3.7 Flash (Google AI)
Input listed rate
$0.17 / 1M Tokens
$0.75 / 1M Tokens
Output listed rate
$0.66 / 1M Tokens
$3.75 / 1M Tokens
Cached Input rate
—
$0.08 / 1M Tokens
Context Window
10000K Tokens
1049K Tokens
Modality
llm
llm
🏆Related AI Scenario Leaderboards
Compare model standings across production scenarios weighted by editorial picks, public adoption, and verified price signals.
Want to map listed prices to your usage?
Enter token volume in the free estimator for a directional cost comparison. Validate quality, latency, and provider terms before migrating.